What is a major criticism of the existential approach in psychotherapy?

The criticism that the existential approach in psychotherapy lacks systematic principles and practices highlights the philosophical roots of this therapeutic model. Unlike some other therapeutic approaches that are built upon structured methodologies and standardized techniques, existential therapy is more focused on the subjective experience of individuals and the importance of personal meaning-making. It prioritizes understanding human existence, freedom, choice, and the search for meaning, which can sometimes lead to a perception that it is less structured or disciplined in comparison to more directive therapies.

This absence of a clear, systematic approach can be a challenge for practitioners who seek specific tools or protocols to address client issues. Clients may also find it disorienting if they are accustomed to therapies that offer more defined paths to follow. The inherent complexity of human existence and the variability in each person's experience make it difficult to establish universal principles or standardized practices within this therapeutic framework. Thus, while existential therapy is profoundly insightful, the criticism reflects concerns around its applicability in more structured therapeutic settings.